Supplementary file 1_Reclassifying congruence in wellbeing: a systematic review and alignment framework.docx

Data were extracted using a structured protocol and synthesized using interpretive conceptual analysis. Findings indicate that the literature does not converge on a single construct of alignment, but rather reflects multiple functionally distinct processes involving correspondence between internal orientations and lived experience. These processes can be organized into (a) indicators of correspondence (e.g., autonomous motivation, value congruence), (b) contextual conditions shaping their expression (e.g., autonomy support), and (c) mechanisms linking alignment to outcomes (e.g., psychological need satisfaction).

Empirical evidence is strongest at momentary and same-day timescales, with consistent within-person associations with affect, vitality, and engagement. Evidence for lagged or extended temporal dynamics is comparatively limited. Support is most robust for motivational processes, moderate for relational processes, and comparatively weak for value-based processes, particularly in temporally sensitive designs.

Alignment is best understood as a multi-process, multi-domain framework rather than a unified construct. This review clarifies conceptual overlap, identifies asymmetries in empirical support, and delineates conditions under which dynamic models of wellbeing can be more rigorously tested. Findings provide a foundation for developing process-based, within-person models of flourishing.</p>