Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2026

Reforming investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS): European Union flexing its normative power?

Listed in ZivaHub and Deakin Research Online and DMU Figshare and UCL Research Data Repository — shown once because both records carry DOI 10.17034/32631531.v1

This thesis examines whether the European Union (‘EU’) is acting as a normative power in its pursuit of reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (‘ISDS’) in the form of the European Commission’s (‘Commission’) proposals on the Investment Court System (‘ICS’).

Description

The EU has emerged as a major player in international investment, and the EU is pursuing reform of ISDS in its new generation of trade and investment agreements.

This dissertation seeks to contribute to Normative Power Europe (‘NPE’) literature as proposed by Ian Manners by incorporating normative ethics of the EU analysis to the novel case of ICS at the bilateral and multilateral levels. It examines the virtue, deontological and consequentialist ethical positions that the EU takes in relation to the speeches, policies, and papers it has made in relation to ISDS reform.<br><br>The project is presented in two parts.

Read the rest (2 more)

Part A contains the literature review and the dissertation. The literature review provides an overview of international investment law and EU investment law and policy. The dissertation argues that the EU appears to be largely acting in a normatively ethical manner with its proposal for reform of ISDS.

The area in which the EU appears to be less coherent is when it comes to the impact and participation of third countries and raises further questions of the relationship of economic norms and interests. Part B contains the Case Note and Statute Report to further explore the topic of ISDS reform.

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Provenance · 4 source records, 16 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
ZivaHuboai:figshare.com:article/326315315 d agoJSON v1
Deakin Research Onlineoai:figshare.com:article/326315315 d agoJSON v1
DMU Figshareoai:figshare.com:article/326315315 d agoJSON v1
UCL Research Data Repositoryoai:figshare.com:article/326315315 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:480308mapping · dro deakin edu auvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['investment law']
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:480308mapping · rdr ucl ac ukvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['investment law']
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:480308mapping · zivahub uct ac zavocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['investment law']
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:480308mapping · figshare dmu ac ukvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['investment law']
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · rdr ucl ac ukconnector:rdr_ucl_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · rdr ucl ac ukconnector:rdr_ucl_ac_uk@1.0.0
descriptionsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
license_textsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
publication_datesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
titlesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title