The Research of Comparison of Practice Display the Normal University\'s Students and Another University\'s Education Students the New Teacher Development System Using

The main purpose of this study is to develop the evaluation checklist of preservice teacher practice display in secondary school, and give question survey to those preservice teacher . the practice display evaluation report of preservice teacher is established based on the study result questionnaire and interview. The questionnaire for secondary school preservice teacher evaluation checklist comprised five parts: (1) instructional skill; (2) Personal relationship; (3) Communicational skill; (4) Class management; (5) Professional development, with 63 items totally.

The major findings of this study are: A.Present condition: （a）Normal University\'s students and another university\'s education students have above average numbers in their display of \"practice\". （b）Normal university\'s students and another university\'s education students find the three areas ：self-placement, independence , and fairness, all need improvement. B.Display in \"Practice\" （a）Both student groups thinks they did quite well, （b）Area of Instructional skills ： Normal University\'s students care about academic field instructions and teaching courses with organization .

General University\'s education students weigh more on compliments and motivation, encouraging students to raise questions and their different views. Both groups displayed lower marks in arranging student seating and decorating the classroom. （c）Professional Development Normal University\'s students actively research related journals and books in their course field. General University\'s education students actively seek advising teachers for discussion and their experience.

Both groups did not so well in actively seeking university professors for their experience and discussion, as well as academic media about development. （d）Class management: Normal University*s students advise class to establish order and rules as well as controlling class attendance. General University\'s education students advise their students to obey class rules , also advising and correcting wrong behavior in their students .

Both groups did not so well in staying in touch with parents. （e）Personal Relationship: Normal University\'s students and Another University\'s education students in their \" Practice \" both achieved \" Establishment of Peaceful Teacher-Student relationship \" and \" Establishment of Peaceful Collegue to Collegue relationship\".Both groups did poor in area of establishing good active communication relationship with parents. （f）Personal Communicational skills: Normal University*s students care about good oral and body language and their display in \"practice\" .

But Another University\'s education students care also about oral language communication as well as good level of humor and familiarity. Both groups did not so well in using reasonable body language to show encouragement and caring for their students. C、The comparision of Normal University and another university student as teachers in \"practice\" : Except in \"Class Management\", the practice display as a whole did not have much obvious difference .

There are many differences in other areas such as \"Instructional skills\". D、Analysis of personal background of Normal University\'s student and another university\'s education students and their relationship to their \"Practice\". display assessment. E、Analysis of background of school of \" Practice \" in relationship to their assessment of \"Practice\" display .

Also, targeting the academic administration department, Department of teacher training, Department of \"Practice\" schools, and other \"Practice\" teachers for several advice for improvement.