Invisible language 2019: A sociological view on intra- and interspecies intuitive communication

The coding of unpredictability of each valid piece of information was based on triangulation of opinions and recordings of three independent veterinary experts. The degree of detail was measured by coders. The reliability of all the three variables was tested with Holsti coefficient, which varied from 0.82 to 1.

The correlation between respondent status (i.e. belonging to a group) and the nature of the information (i.e. the degree of validity, unpredictability, and detail) varies from 0.401 to 0.689 (Eta coefficient), depending on the use of different filters. Further, the qualitative analysis of the semantic character of valid, unpredictable and detailed information from animal communicators has unearthed its "puzzling" and discontinuous character.

There is also diversity of the types of valid information between individual communicators. In sum, we have data supporting the idea that some people systematically employing intuitive processes are capable of achieving highly valid results with relative frequency, but we lack an unequivocal theoretical explanation of the phenomenon, which is a challenge for further research.