← Search

Data · dataset · 2024

Fiscal Policy, Institutional Quality, and Inequality

Listed in Teesside University Research Data Repository

The study examined the effect of fiscal policy on income inequality and whether institutional quality matters given heterogeneity in fiscal policy approach and income redistribution among different countries.

Description

We use the Gini coefficient from the Sweiss Standardised Income Inequality Database (SWIID). It measures disposable income (income after tax) among individuals.

The scale ranges from 0 (perfect equality) to 100 (perfect inequality). We used tax revenue (% of GDP) minus government spending (% of GDP) as a measure of fiscal policy. We calculated it using data from the World Bank World Development Indicators.

Read the rest (4 more)

We use an average of the six composite governance indicators—voice of accountability, political stability and absence of violence or terrorism, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law, and control of corruption—from the World Bank World Governance Indicators to comprehensively measure the efficiency and effectiveness of a country's formal institutions. We use growth and trade as control variables due to their potential redistributive effects.

The World Bank World Development Indicators measure economic growth through the annual GDP growth rate. Another control variable is trade. We measure trade using the World Bank World Development Indicators data, calculating total exports and imports as a percentage of GDP.

We used 21 countries from 1996 to 2022. The study included countries with high institutional quality and others with low institutional quality. The results show that strong institutions generally bolster the reduction of income inequality through expansionary fiscal policy.

The individual country effects show varied results across countries with weak and strong institutions. This shows that the relationship between fiscal policy, institutional quality, and income inequality is affected by differences in how fiscal policy is applied and whether institutional quality puts efficiency ahead of redistribution.

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Provenance · 1 source records, 7 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
Teesside University Research Data Repositoryoai:data.mendeley.com/x936mcx5wr.110 h agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:economics-financemapping · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0
descriptionsource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
licensesource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/rights
publication_datesource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0
titlesource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title