← Search

Data · dataset · 2024

Bicycle Sharing - Post Adoption Intentions

Listed in Teesside University Research Data Repository

This study explores the post-adoption intentions of users regarding dockless bicycle-sharing services by integrating the Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT) and Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT).

Description

The primary research hypotheses are that various factors (such as compatibility, de-ownership orientation, image barriers, value barriers, usage barriers, perceived scarcity risk, and risk barriers) influence self-efficacy, which in turn affects users' continued use intentions (CUI) and recommendation intentions (RI) of dockless bike-sharing services.

Data for this study was collected via a web-based survey conducted in China’s first and second-tier cities, using the Questionnaire Star platform, China's largest survey tool. A total of 358 respondents participated, representing diverse demographic and cultural backgrounds. The survey included questions on compatibility, de-ownership orientation, perceived barriers (such as value, image, and usage barriers), perceived scarcity risk, and self-efficacy related to using dockless bike-sharing services.

Read the rest (3 more)

Participants were also asked about their intentions to continue using and recommending these services. The data was analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), a robust method for examining complex relationships between latent variables. PLS-SEM was chosen due to its suitability for exploratory research in less-studied areas, such as bicycle-sharing practices.

The analysis proceeded in two stages: first, evaluating the measurement model for reliability and validity, and second, examining the structural model to assess relationships between latent variables. The study finds that self-efficacy is a critical factor in the continued use and recommendation of dockless bike-sharing services. Positive influences on self-efficacy include the service's compatibility with users' lifestyles and a de-ownership orientation, while negative influences include perceived scarcity, usage barriers, and value concerns.

Interestingly, concerns about social status (image barriers) can also enhance self-efficacy if addressed effectively. The data suggests that service providers should focus on improving compatibility, promoting the benefits of de-ownership, ensuring bike availability, and reducing practical barriers. For urban planners, creating supportive environments with dedicated infrastructure and policies can further foster adoption and sustained use of bike-sharing services.

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Image 75%
Provenance · 1 source records, 8 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
Teesside University Research Data Repositoryoai:data.mendeley.com/6r6gh3b4s2.116 h agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:economics-financemapping · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[modality].local:modality:imageenrichment · researchdata tees ac ukkeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (75%)
descriptionsource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
licensesource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/rights
publication_datesource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0
titlesource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title