Does China’s Flow of FDI and Institutional Quality Matter for Poverty? Evidence from Africa

Data for the HDI was sourced from the Human Development Report Office (HDRO), while poverty gap data was obtained from the World Development Indicators (WDI) of the World Bank. In Table 1, Chinese FDI inflows were sourced from China's Ministry of Commerce database, given their significant contribution to overall FDI inflows in Africa. An index of institutions and governance, which includes measures such as the rule of law, regulatory quality, government effectiveness, corruption control, voice and accountability, and political stability, was employed.

Separate regressions were conducted using individual indicators to assess their impact on poverty reduction. Data on governance and institutions were sourced from the World Governance Indicator (WGI). Control variables such as GDP per capita, trade openness, inflation, population, domestic capital, private credit, and government expenditure were included in the analysis.

These control variables were sourced from the World Development Indicators (WDI). The results of the pooled ordinary least squares (OLS) analysis indicated that Chinese FDI alone does not reduce poverty unless there are strong institutions and good governance. Moreover, the findings demonstrated that strong institutions and good governance have a poverty-reducing effect in Africa.