Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2011

Replication data for: Experimental Designs for Identifying Causal Mechanisms

Listed in Harvard Dataverse

Experimentation is a powerful methodology that enables scientists to empirically establish causal claims.

Description

However, one important criticism is that experiments merely provide a black-box view of causality and fail to identify causal mechanisms. Specifically, critics argue that although experiments can identify average causal effects, they cannot explain the process through which such effects come about.

If true, this represents a serious limitation of experimentation, especially for social and medical science research that strive to identify causal mechanisms. In this paper, we consider the several different experimental designs that help identify average natural indirect effects. Some of these designs require the direct manipulation of an intermediate variable, while others can be used even when only imperfect manipulation is possible.

Read the rest (1 more)

We use recent social science experiments to illustrate the key ideas that underlie each of the proposed designs.

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Applied economics 73%
Provenance · 1 source records, 7 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
Harvard Dataversedoi:10.7910/DVN/LMC3FM12 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[field].anzsrc:group:3801enrichment · Harvard Dataversetaxonomy-embedding@1.1.0title+keywords+description (73%)
created_datesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0
descriptionsource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0/description
publication_datesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0
titlesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0/name
updated_datesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0
version_labelsource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0