← Search

Data · dataset · 2026

OJIP drought and heat systematic review: evidence database and reproducibility package

Listed in Teesside University Research Data Repository

This dataset contains the structured evidence base and reproducibility materials underlying the systematic review “OJIP chlorophyll fluorescence responses to drought, heat and combined drought–heat stress: a systematic review and quantitative evidence synthesis”.

Description

The review assembled a harmonised corpus of 868 unique publications identified from Scopus and PubMed/MEDLINE. Of these, 449 publications were retained as review-relevant evidence, including 114 final full-text core studies and 331 supporting publications.

The repository includes database-search documentation, a publication-level screening and harmonisation audit, operational coding rules, the final 114-study full-text core evidence matrix, a dedicated combined drought–heat design and interaction audit, publication-level quantitative evidence-density summaries, and provenance, quality-control and reproducibility documentation. The data capture study design, stress type and severity, OJIP/JIP variables, full-transient and phase-specific responses, reaction-centre behaviour, donor-side/OEC-associated evidence, post-QA/acceptor-side responses, intersystem and PSI-associated evidence, recovery and acclimation, genotype/species variation, phenotyping relevance and supporting physiological measurements.

Read the rest (2 more)

The evidence framework distinguishes diagnostic sensitivity from mechanistic specificity. Fluorescence-derived localisation is therefore kept separate from independently corroborated or directly measured processes, and null, contradictory, uncertain and source-limited evidence is retained explicitly. Combined drought–heat studies are additionally classified according to experimental architecture, with four-state treatment design, pairwise treatment differences, formal drought × heat interaction and biological synergy treated as distinct evidentiary levels.

Publication-level counts and proportions in the dataset describe the breadth, distribution and maturity of the evidence base and should not be interpreted as pooled biological effect sizes. Copyrighted article full texts and licensed raw database exports are not redistributed.

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Provenance · 1 source records, 9 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
Teesside University Research Data Repositoryoai:data.mendeley.com/yyprpf524v.110 h agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:310806mapping · researchdata tees ac ukvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['Plant Physiology']
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:340606mapping · researchdata tees ac ukvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['Photochemistry']
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:life-sciencesmapping · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0
descriptionsource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
licensesource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/rights
publication_datesource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0
titlesource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title