Data Sheet 1_Empirical evaluation of an ICF core set for managing musculoskeletal conditions in primary care physical therapy services in Spain: a multicenter study.pdf

Paired perspectives were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-adjusted p-values, effect sizes, ICC(2,1), and individual absolute differences exceeding an interpretive 15 mm benchmark. The study was reported according to STROBE.</p>Results<p>All 34 ICF categories exceeded the retention threshold (23.3–94.3%) and remained retained for all disability and comorbidity subgroups. WHODAS 2.0 showed moderate positive correlations with Body Functions and Activities and Participation ratings (Spearman's ρ = 0.329–0.357), whereas SCQ correlations were weaker (ρ = 0.178–0.202).

Absolute paired-score correspondence ranged from moderate to excellent (ICC = 0.697–0.958). Twenty-seven comparisons were significant before adjustment and 20 after Holm adjustment. Differences were generally small (|r| = 0.012–0.356); the largest mean difference was 7.83 mm for “b710 Mobility of joint functions”.

Across categories, 5.7%–29.3% of dyads exceeded 15 mm.</p>Discussion<p>The findings provide empirical support for retaining the 34 categories and indicate generally substantial group-level correspondence alongside potentially informative individual differences. Further research should evaluate measurement properties, feasibility, responsiveness, and implementation in routine primary care.</p>