Supplementary file 1_A comparative study of traditional Chinese mind-body therapies on sleep quality, mental health, and quality of life in patients with sleep disorders: a network meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.docx

Outcome measures included sleep quality, mental health, and quality of life. A network meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed to calculate standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals, and the cumulative ranking probability curve area was used to rank the efficacy of the interventions.</p>Result<p>This study included a total of 18 randomized controlled trials. Regarding sleep quality, TCCWTMS yielded the best results (SMD = −1.15, 95% CI [−2.07, −0.22]).

Regarding mental health, only the Tai Chi intervention achieved statistical significance (SMD = 0.64, 95% CI [0.07, 1.21], P = 0.03); although Baduanjin ranked first in the SUCRA ranking (92.6%), pairwise comparisons did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07). Regarding quality of life, both Tai Chi (SMD = -0.47, 95% CI [-0.71, -0.24], P < 0.0001) and Baduanjin (SMD = -0.57, 95% CI [-0.91, -0.23], P = 0.001) were significantly effective.

There were significant heterogeneous differences in the efficacy of the three interventions across different outcome measures.</p>Conclusion<p>This study indicates that the TCCWTMS is the most effective intervention for improving sleep quality in patients with sleep disorders. Regarding quality of life, both Baduanjin and Tai Chi demonstrated significant effects, with Baduanjin showing superior efficacy. Regarding mental health, the current evidence is insufficient to determine the optimal intervention strategy.

There are significant differences in the efficacy of the three interventions across various outcome measures; clinical decisions can be made by selecting the appropriate intervention based on the patient’s score needs.</p>Systematic review registration<p>crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261415202, identifier CRD420261415202.</p>