Constarium
← Search

Table · dataset · 2018

Data for Eye movements in strategic choice

Listed in figshare

In risky and other multiattribute choices, the process of choosing is well described by random walk or drift diffusion models in which evidence is accumulated over time to threshold.

Description

In strategic choices, level-k and cognitive hierarchy models have been offered as accounts of the choice process, in which people simulate the choice processes of their opponents or partners. We recorded the eye movements in 2 × 2 symmetric games including dominance-solvable games like prisoner's dilemma and asymmetric coordination games like stag hunt and hawk–dove.

The evidence was most consistent with the accumulation of payoff differences over time: we found longer duration choices with more fixations when payoffs differences were more finely balanced, an emerging bias to gaze more at the payoffs for the action ultimately chosen, and that a simple count of transitions between payoffs—whether or not the comparison is strategically informative—was strongly associated with the final choice.

Read the rest (2 more)

The accumulator models do account for these strategic choice process measures, but the level-k and cognitive hierarchy models do not.<br><br>Data record consists of 6 data files in .csv format with an accompanying readme file. We explored the choices and eye movements made by participants in a range of symmetric 2 × 2 games. Our approach is to build statistical models, which describe the eye movements and their relation to choices.

Fifty-four undergraduate and postgraduate students were recruited from Warwick University and participated for a payment of £5 plus a further payment of up to £5 contingent upon the outcome of a randomly selected game. Details on each individual data file can be found in the accompanying readme.

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Artificial intelligence 71%
Provenance · 1 source records, 17 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
figshareoai:figshare.com:article/338033179 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].anzsrc:group:4602enrichment · figshare comtaxonomy-embedding@1.0.0title+keywords+description (71%)
concepts[field].local:field:astronomymapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:chemistrymapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:computer-science-aimapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:economics-financemapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:engineeringmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:life-sciencesmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:medicine-healthmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:ocean-atmosphericmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
descriptionsource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
licensesource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0/metadata/dc/rights
publication_datesource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
titlesource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title