Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2026

Replication data for: Pull the plug on “dark taxa”: Uncritical knowledge creation in a complicit academy

Listed in Borealis

In biodiversity science, there is an emerging trend to use the phrase 'dark taxa' to refer to undescribed/unknown species or taxa.

Description

The term "dark taxa," is harmful, unnecessary, and reinforces the discipline's racist and exclusionary legacy instead of correcting it. To encourage authors, reviewers, and mentors in Biodiversity Sciences and other academic enterprises to avoid and reject terms like “dark taxa” and embrace neutral ones, already available and in use in all hemispheres, such as "cryptic diversity” and “cryptic species” instead we conducted citation analyses to demonstrate how the trend has emerged and where.

We conducted citation analyses for the terms “dark taxa”, “provisional species” or “unknown species”, “undescribed species”, “cryptic species” or (in the plural) “cryptic diversity”. In the first instance, we used the Clarivate™ (Web of Science™) (© Clarivate 2025) to search for these terms by year and record the number of citations (and the total number of publications recorded by the database for that year). Using the ggplot2 package in R and RStudio, we scaled these trends to plot the novel term “dark taxa” and the accepted terms on the same plots.

Read the rest (2 more)

To examine geographic patterns associated with these published phrases, we used the bibliometrix package in R to extract the associated Nation of the corresponding author and plotted these using the sf package in R. To access contemporary, non-scientific searches on Google we searched the terms “dark taxa”, “undescribed species”, “cryptic species” and “cryptic diversity” using Glimpse (meetglimpse.com/) to find the total number of Google searches each month between January 2004 and March 2026.

We used Glimpse to estimate non-scientific internet searches because Google Trends reports only a measure of the relative popularity of a search out of 100. In this dataset, we present the output for the citation analyses, and the R code used to create Figures 1-4 in our manuscript.

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Provenance · 1 source records, 11 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
Borealisdoi:10.5683/SP4/CQRFUM10 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[field].dataverse_subject:arts-and-humanitiessource · borealisdata caconnector:borealisdata_ca@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].dataverse_subject:earth-and-environmental-sciencessource · borealisdata caconnector:borealisdata_ca@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · borealisdata caconnector:borealisdata_ca@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · borealisdata caconnector:borealisdata_ca@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:life-sciencesmapping · borealisdata caconnector:borealisdata_ca@1.0.0/subjects
created_datesource · borealisdata caconnector:borealisdata_ca@1.0.0
descriptionsource · borealisdata caconnector:borealisdata_ca@1.0.0/description
publication_datesource · borealisdata caconnector:borealisdata_ca@1.0.0
titlesource · borealisdata caconnector:borealisdata_ca@1.0.0/name
updated_datesource · borealisdata caconnector:borealisdata_ca@1.0.0
version_labelsource · borealisdata caconnector:borealisdata_ca@1.0.0