Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 1999

A Survey on Response and Error Ratio of Optical Illusory Figures between Art Students and Non-art Students in Taiwan

Listed in Harvard Dataverse

The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the recognition of optical illusory figures among students (high school or college students) and to test the degree of illusion to establish national relative information.

Description

This survey focuses on geometric illusion and adopts the questionnaires with Muller-Lyer\'s figures. A series of illusory relative figures including standard figures and a variety of revised figures are designed to let the testers observe and choose.

The results are concluded through the statistics of samples and analysis.In addition, this study also investigates the recognition state of teaching on optical illusory figures. According to the results of experiments, students all have illusory phenomena to Muller-Lyer, Delboeuf and Ponzo\'s figures, especially for Muller-Lyer\'s figures. The average illusory ratio is about 11%.

Read the rest (5 more)

It is pretty high. Among individual figures, the exceeding large ratio of Muller-Lyer\'s \"Linking Standard Type\" is about 19.3% . This exceeds all the other types.

There is no clear difference between art students and non-art students to the above illusory figures. Generally speaking, the illusory amount of students of fine-arts department is a little higher than the illusory amount of general students, but the ratio is limited about 0.5 %. Sometimes the lower illusory amount appears in the fine-art students, so there is no absolutely stable difference about illusion between art students and non-art students.

Concerning the learning recognition of illusory figures, there are five situations: (1) The level of learning or recognition is not high. (2) The source of learning or contact mostly comes from professional courses. (3) The contents of the provided figures are not wide enough to offer a lot of illusory information.

Many people just contact geometric illusory figures. (4) Being interesting and curious are students\'impressions to the illusory figures. (5) The current teaching materials need to be revised and enlarged.

The great difference can be found between the art group and non-art group about the points mentioned above. Basically fine-art students have better response with respect to recognition, feeling, abundance of teaching materials, contact of professional books and judgment of the figures. Therefore, it is rather professional regarding the teaching and recognition effects of illusory figures.

Links

Topics

Inferred from text
Art history, theory and criticism 74%
Provenance · 1 source records, 6 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
Harvard Dataversedoi:10.6141/TW-SRDA-E87006-112 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[field].anzsrc:group:3601enrichment · Harvard Dataversetaxonomy-embedding@1.1.0title+keywords+description (74%)
created_datesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0
descriptionsource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0/description
publication_datesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0
titlesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0/name
updated_datesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0