← Search

Data · dataset · 2026

Investigating the prognostic and predictive role of biomarkers in breast cancer

Listed in ZivaHub and Deakin Research Online and DMU Figshare — shown once because both records carry DOI 10.17034/32805134.v1

Breast cancer, a disease characterised by significant molecular and clinical heterogeneity, remains the most prevalent cancer among women globally and continues to be a leading cause of cancer-related deaths, with an estimated 670,000 deaths in 2022.

Description

Despite progress in treatment, chemotherapy remains the cornerstone for many patients, particularly those at high risk of relapse, such as those with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

However, chemotherapy is not universally effective, and it is associated with substantial side effects. The challenge remains to identify predictive biomarkers that can guide personalised treatment, improving outcomes and minimising toxicity. This study aimed to refine patient stratification and personalise treatment strategies for breast cancer using two complementary approaches. <br><br>The first approach involved a hypothesis-driven strategy to investigate five biomarkers (TOP2A, PTEN, EGFR, IGF1R and phospho-mTOR) selected based on their roles in treatment response as indicated by prior studies.

Read the rest (5 more)

These biomarkers were analysed in a cohort of 303 patients from the "Breast 300" study, all treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Digital pathology software (QuPath) was used to quantify biomarker expression in tissue samples from a tissue microarray (TMA), with matched clinical and pathological data. Differential expression analysis revealed that all five biomarkers were significantly associated with patient outcomes, particularly relapse-free survival (RFS).

A composite five-biomarker signature was generated, which demonstrated superior predictive power compared to any individual marker, identifying patients with a high likelihood of a favourable outcome to standard-of-care chemotherapy. In contrast, patients with a score of zero or below were less likely to benefit from chemotherapy, suggesting the potential for alternative, targeted treatments. <br><br>The second approach focused on TNBC, a particularly aggressive subtype with the poorest prognosis.

Previous transcriptomic analysis by the Buckley group identified MST4 as a gene differentially expressed in relation to patient relapse within the Breast 300 cohort. The hypothesis was that MST4 expression contributes to poor outcomes specifically in TNBC. Bioinformatic analyses using in-house and publicly available datasets confirmed that high MST4 expression was significantly associated with poor prognosis in TNBC.

Further investigation in in vitro models demonstrated that MST4 regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis, primarily through the ERK signalling pathway, which is known to play a critical role in cell cycle progression and survival. The study also explored the potential therapeutic implications of targeting MST4, showing that TNBC cell lines with high MST4 expression were sensitive to treatments with Hesperadin (MST4 inhibitor) and MEK/ERK inhibitors, suggesting new avenues for targeted therapies in TNBC. <br><br>In conclusion, this study identified a five-biomarker signature with the potential to predict response to adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy in breast cancer.

MST4 was also highlighted as a key regulator in TNBC, offering potential as a therapeutic target. Together, these findings may aid patient stratification and contribute to more personalised treatment strategies, ultimately improving outcomes and quality of life. <br><br><i>Thesis is embargoed until 31 July 2028.</i>

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Cancer 75% · Disease 75% · Predictive and prognostic markers 80%
Provenance · 3 source records, 14 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
ZivaHuboai:figshare.com:article/3280513412 d agoJSON v1
Deakin Research Onlineoai:figshare.com:article/3280513412 d agoJSON v1
DMU Figshareoai:figshare.com:article/3280513412 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[disease].local:disease:cancerenrichment · zivahub uct ac zakeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (75%)
concepts[disease].local:disease:diseaseenrichment · zivahub uct ac zakeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (75%)
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:321109enrichment · zivahub uct ac zataxonomy-embedding@1.1.0title+keywords+description (80%)
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:medicine-healthmapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:medicine-healthmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:medicine-healthmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
descriptionsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
license_textsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
publication_datesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
titlesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title