Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2011

Replication data for: Improving Statistical Inference with Clustered Data

Listed in Harvard Dataverse

Political science data often contain grouped observations, which produces unobserved "cluster effects" in statistical models.

Description

Typical solutions include (1) ignoring the impact on coefficients and only adjusting the standard errors of generalized linear models (GLM) or (2) addressing clustering in coefficient estimation while relying on a parametric assumption for the cluster effects and/or a large number of clusters for standard errors.

I show that both approaches are problematic for inference. Through simulation I demonstrate that multilevel modeling (MLM) and generalized estimating equations (GEE) produce more efficient coefficients than does GLM. Next, I show that commonly-used MLM and GEE standard error methods can be biased downward, while bootstrapping by resampling clusters (BCSE) performs better, even with a misspecified error distribution and/or few clusters.

Read the rest (1 more)

I recommend the use of MLM or GEE to estimate coefficients and BCSE to estimate uncertainty, and show that this approach can produce divergent conclusions in applied research.

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Simulation 75%
Provenance · 1 source records, 7 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
Harvard Dataversedoi:10.7910/DVN/FYX1QY13 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[method].local:method:simulationenrichment · Harvard Dataversekeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (75%)
created_datesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0
descriptionsource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0/description
publication_datesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0
titlesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0/name
updated_datesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0
version_labelsource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0