Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2026

Print, rhetoric, and 'plantation,' 1571-1641

Listed in ZivaHub and Deakin Research Online and DMU Figshare — shown once because both records carry DOI 10.17034/32637498.v1

This thesis offers a new model for understanding the rise of the word plantation as a keyword of anglophone colonialism in the early seventeenth century.

Description

Generally approached as a simple (and perhaps simplistic) synonym for colony in both the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries,plantation is missing from printed Elizabethan texts which promoted colonial settlement in Ireland and the Americas. Instead, in a colonial context,plantation rose to sudden prominence in promotional pamphlets published in 1609 and 1610, and James VI/I was an active agent in this discursive shift.

Tracing the word’s colonial appropriation to a previously unrecognized connection with sixteenth-century pamphleteering regarding the dissolution of the monasteries, the thesis argues that plantation had taken on a distinctive association with religious reform and divine providence by the time the word was adopted as the Jacobean name for colonial settlement. Thus, plantation offered a means for suggesting both classical and Christian authorities for the colonial enterprise - a duality not open to colony.

Read the rest (2 more)

More definitively than kingdom, colony, or commonwealth, the word plantation yoked the civil and the ecclesiastical, and transformed the colonial promotional pamphlet into a space where monarch and subject could publicly, but indirectly, contest competing conceptions of the relationship between temporal and spiritual authority. Through rhetorical analysis which considers how the printed form was engaged in the making of meaning, the thesis provides a study of the colonial promotional pamphlet from 1571, when print was first used to promote a particular English colonial project, to 1641, when violence broke out on “plantation” lands in Ireland.

It offers new readings of colonial texts by Walter Ralegh, Francis Bacon, Thomas Blenerhasset, John Davies, John Donne, and John Cotton; an examination of the rhetoric of “plantation” as it was deployed by James VI/I; and an analysis of the word’s appearances in the 1641 Depositions.

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Provenance · 3 source records, 7 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
ZivaHuboai:figshare.com:article/3263749810 d agoJSON v1
Deakin Research Onlineoai:figshare.com:article/3263749810 d agoJSON v1
DMU Figshareoai:figshare.com:article/3263749810 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
descriptionsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
license_textsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
publication_datesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
titlesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title