Data · collection · 2017
Supplementary material from "The impact of induced anxiety on affective response inhibition"
Listed in DataCite
Studying the effects of experimentally induced anxiety in healthy volunteers may increase our understanding of the mechanisms underpinning anxiety disorders.
Description
Experimentally induced stress (via threat of unpredictable shock) improves accuracy at withholding a response on the sustained attention to response task (SART), and in separate studies improves accuracy to classify fearful faces, creating an affective bias. Integrating these findings, participants at two public science engagement events ( n = 46, n = 55) were recruited to explore the effects of experimentally induced stress on an affective version of the SART.
We hypothesized that we would see an improved accuracy at withholding a response to affectively congruent stimuli (i.e. increased accuracy at withholding a response to fearful ‘no-go’ distractors) under threat of shock. Induced anxiety slowed reaction time, and at the second event quicker responses were made to fearful stimuli. However, we did not observe improved inhibition overall during induced anxiety, and there was no evidence to suggest an interaction between induced anxiety and stimulus valence on response accuracy.
Read the rest (1 more)
Indeed Bayesian analysis provided decisive evidence against this hypothesis. We suggest that the presence of emotional stimuli might make the safe condition more anxiogenic, reducing the differential between conditions and knocking out any threat-potentiated improvement.
Links
Where it is published
- Repository landing page figshare.com/collections/Supplementary_material_from_The_impact_of_induced_… ↗
landing page · from DataCite
- DOI doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3787400 ↗
DOI / persistent id · from DataCite
Documentation and papers
- CC BY creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 ↗
license · from DataCite
- IsSupplementTo 10.1098/rsos.170084 doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170084 ↗
publication · from DataCite
Catalogue records · 2
- DataCite API api.datacite.org/dois/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3787400 ↗
metadata API · from DataCite
- DataCite Commons commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3787400 ↗
catalogue entry · from DataCite
Topics
- Stated by source
- Psychology
- Inferred from text
- Biological psychology 71%
Related
Provenance · 1 source records, 9 field assertions
| Source | Key | Last seen | Raw |
|---|---|---|---|
| DataCite | 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3787400 | 13 d ago | JSON v1 |
| Field | Assertion | Extractor | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| access_level | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/rightsList |
| concepts[field].anzsrc:group:5202 | enrichment · DataCite | taxonomy-embedding@1.1.0 | title+keywords+description (71%) |
| concepts[field].fos:psychology | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | |
| created_date | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | |
| description | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/descriptions |
| license | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/rightsList |
| publication_date | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/dates |
| title | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/titles/0/title |
| updated_date | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 |