Replication Data for: Fig 20.2, GPDs, Males, LRS for sexual partners, all three colonies, 11 July 2026

Logic here, and for other species: With so many observed With so many observed different sexual partners, I probably observed >=50%. In any event, it seems that I should not ignore such males who were so successful in a single year for analyses that involve LRS for cops of male GPDs On 09 April 2021, this file has now been checked TWO TIMES Cops = copulations Number of different sexual partners = Number of different sexual partners over lifetime For GPDs from VCC of VCNP, I use a suffix of "V" for every GPD marker and eartag-- to reduce possible confusion with GPDS from RMC of VCNP All data in this file are from GPD males that copulated with >=1 female All data from males that were not observed to copulate are EXCLUDED from this file I have EXCLUDED BTPDs with 0 cops, even if they survived for >=2 years.

For several males listed in this file that copulated with >=1 female, we have NO EVIDENCE FROM MICROSATS that those males sired >=1 emergent juvenile. Copulating males that evidently did not sire any offspring include the following: For 2013: 28 (123) For 2014: 108 (C47), 25 (439), 32 (593) For 2015: 20#2 (815), 107 (C39) For 2016: 37#2 (C99) For 2017: 24 (203) For 2018: 32 (79), 6 (395). 14 (55), 47 (435), 17 (O235) Date = 31 March 2021 This new file checked TWO TIMES for Babies and Yearlings on 31 March-02 April 2021 Data in this file are from the following three study colonies: GPD Redondo Meadow Colony (RMC, studied in 2013 through 2016) was at Valles Caldera National Preserve (VCNP).

GPD Visitor Center Colony (VCC, studied in 2017 and 2018) was also at VCNP. GPD colony at Petrified Forest National Park (PEFO) was studied from 1989 through 1995. File name = Fig 20.2, GPDs, Males, LRS for sexual partners, all three colonies, 11 July 2026