Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2026

<p>Participant demographics.</p>

Listed in NCL Data

<div><p>Socket fit is essential for successful upper-limb prosthetic devices, yet current design workflows remain labor-intensive and dependent on clinician experience.

Description

Several digital and algorithmic approaches have been proposed to partially automate socket design, many of which rely on characterizing conventional design practice. In upper-limb prosthetics, prior research has quantified transradial socket rectification practices, but the direct geometric relationship between the residual limb and final socket remains unclear despite its importance to digital socket design workflows.

This study examined whether simple linear regression models could provide a preliminary, interpretable description of limb–socket geometric relationships in transradial socket design. Fourteen participants with transradial limb absence were included, whose digitized limb–socket pairs were aligned using a novel spline-based method. Relationships were quantified using global descriptors (volume, surface area, and proximal–distal length) and cross-sectional descriptors at 25%, 50%, and 75% of limb length (mediolateral length, anterior–posterior length, circumference, and cross-sectional area).

Read the rest (2 more)

For each descriptor, simple linear regressions were fit to predict socket geometry from limb geometry, and model performance was evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation. Global descriptors demonstrated strong linear relationships, with R² values ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 and predicted R² values from 0.92 to 0.97, indicating that overall socket size is largely predictable from limb size. Cross-sectional descriptors showed more variable performance, with the strongest results at mid-length and weaker relationships toward the proximal and distal ends.

Mean absolute percentage error ranged from 2.5% to 13.6% across descriptors, while retention values were generally high, indicating limited overfitting. These findings suggest that simple linear models can capture broad scaling relationships between transradial limbs and sockets, but are less able to explain localized geometry in regions where trimline design, suspension strategy, and distal-end clearance play a greater role.</p></div>

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Related

Provenance · 1 source records, 10 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
NCL Dataoai:figshare.com:article/340721984 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · data ncl ac ukconnector:data_ncl_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:440710mapping · data ncl ac ukvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['Science Policy']
concepts[field].anzsrc:group:3101mapping · data ncl ac ukvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['Cell Biology']
concepts[field].anzsrc:group:3105mapping · data ncl ac ukvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['Genetics']
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · data ncl ac ukconnector:data_ncl_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:life-sciencesmapping · data ncl ac ukconnector:data_ncl_ac_uk@1.0.0
descriptionsource · data ncl ac ukconnector:data_ncl_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
licensesource · data ncl ac ukconnector:data_ncl_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/rights
publication_datesource · data ncl ac ukconnector:data_ncl_ac_uk@1.0.0
titlesource · data ncl ac ukconnector:data_ncl_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title