Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2026

Conspiracy theory beliefs and dis/misinformation about gender equality, diversity and inclusion initiatives: an intergroup perspective

Listed in ZivaHub and Deakin Research Online and DMU Figshare — shown once because both records carry DOI 10.17034/32805080.v1

Gender equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) policies and initiatives aim to address inequalities and representation imbalances.

Description

Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) are generally male-dominated, so gender EDI efforts in these fields often focus on supporting women and non-binary people. While attitudes towards EDI policies and initiatives are generally positive or neutral, backlash against them can occur.

In some cases, this backlash may involve the spread of disinformation, misinformation and conspiracy theories. This thesis aims to investigate the psychological antecedents and consequences of conspiracy theories opposing gender EDI policies and initiatives in STEM, with the intention to pilot an intervention which tackles dis/misinformation and conspiracy theories about gender EDI issues. A literature review presented in Chapters 1 and 2 identified the overlap between backlash to gender EDI, dis/misinformation, and conspiracy theory beliefs.

Read the rest (3 more)

Based on this review, a scale measuring conspiracy theories opposing gender EDI initiatives was piloted in Chapters 3 and 4. The findings suggested that intergroup threat towards women in STEM, sexist attitudes, gender in-group identification and a general tendency to believe conspiracy theories were related to conspiracy theorising about gender EDI policies and initiatives. The relationship between conspiracy theory beliefs about gender EDI policies and initiatives and intergroup threat was explored in three experimental studies reported in Chapters 5 and 6.

Exposure to experimental materials designed to elicit intergroup threat towards women in STEM did not lead to increased conspiracy theorising about gender EDI policies and initiatives. However, exposure to conspiracy theories about gender EDI policies and initiatives did marginally increase intergroup threat towards women in STEM. Finally, exposure to a debunking text before exposure to conspiracy theories did not change participants’ acceptance of them.

However, an attitude inoculation intervention for dis/misinformation and conspiracy theories about gender EDI was piloted in Chapter 7, and the results showed promise for addressing these. Chapter 8 evaluates how these findings contribute to the wider literature regarding gendered and intergroup attitudes, backlash to equality and conspiracy theory beliefs.

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Text 75%
Provenance · 3 source records, 8 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
ZivaHuboai:figshare.com:article/3280508010 d agoJSON v1
Deakin Research Onlineoai:figshare.com:article/3280508010 d agoJSON v1
DMU Figshareoai:figshare.com:article/3280508010 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
concepts[modality].local:modality:textenrichment · zivahub uct ac zakeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (75%)
descriptionsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
license_textsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
publication_datesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
titlesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title