Data · dataset · 2001
Managing Environmental Degradation under Uncertainty: a Precautionary Environmental Deposit-refund Bonding System
Listed in Harvard Dataverse
In order to prevent and eliminate environmental degradation, or promote sustainable resource use, policy-making must seek to effective regulatory instruments to realize these objectives.
Description
The market-oriented or incentivebased regulatory instruments are gaining acceptance are more efficiency ways to achieve environmental objectives. But this approach is often limited for dealing with environmental degradation issues under uncertainty.
Recently, a variety of countries have advocated adoption of a \"precautionary principle\" to deal with the problem of true uncertainty. The principle seeks to avoid irreversible damages via the imposition of a safety margin into policy, it states that rather than await uncertainty, regulators should act in anticipation of any potential environmental harm in order to prevent it. But the approach is often weakly effective incentives to environmental resources users to modify their behavioral patterns in environmentally friendlier directions.
Read the rest (3 more)
A new approach is \"precautionary polluter pays principle\"(4P), which extends the polluter pays principle to make the polluter pays for uncertainty as well. This research uses the approach and incorporates the \"post-normal science\", \"safe minimum standard\", and \"transaction cost\" paradigms to discuss a precautionary environmental depositrefund bonding system in the management of environmental degradation under uncertainty.
In Addition, this study adopts attitude surveys to analyzes environment and debris-flow management attitudes with Wilcoxon-type and chi-square tests. Empirical results are as follows: The statistical tests indicate that environmental pollution control significant higher important than environmental risk and resource conservation, that risk reduction decision criteria is significant higher weight than other criterion, and that respondents preference of setting environmental standards over environmental taxes.
In terms of management satisfaction and intent, respondents fell dissatisfaction and consider should adopt more strict regulatory instruments than current regulating activities.
Links
Where it is published
- Dataverse dataset page dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi%3A10.6141%2FTW-SRDA-E88081-1 ↗
landing page · from Harvard Dataverse
- DOI doi.org/10.6141/tw-srda-e88081-1 ↗
DOI / persistent id · from Harvard Dataverse
Catalogue records · 1
- Dataverse API dataverse.harvard.edu/api/datasets/:persistentId/?persistentId=doi%3A10.6141%2FTW-SR… ↗
metadata API · from Harvard Dataverse
Topics
- Inferred from text
- Banking, finance and investment 74%
Provenance · 1 source records, 6 field assertions
| Source | Key | Last seen | Raw |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard Dataverse | doi:10.6141/TW-SRDA-E88081-1 | 14 d ago | JSON v1 |
| Field | Assertion | Extractor | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| concepts[field].anzsrc:group:3502 | enrichment · Harvard Dataverse | taxonomy-embedding@1.1.0 | title+keywords+description (74%) |
| created_date | source · Harvard Dataverse | connector:dataverse@1.0.0 | |
| description | source · Harvard Dataverse | connector:dataverse@1.0.0 | /description |
| publication_date | source · Harvard Dataverse | connector:dataverse@1.0.0 | |
| title | source · Harvard Dataverse | connector:dataverse@1.0.0 | /name |
| updated_date | source · Harvard Dataverse | connector:dataverse@1.0.0 |