← Search

Table · dataset · 2019

Data for Measured dynamic properties for FRP footbridges and their critical comparison against structures made of conventional construction materials

Listed in figshare

The related paper reports new experimental data for dynamic properties (i.e. modal mass, natural frequency and damping ratio) of eight FRP composite footbridges in Europe, which helps to resolve the weakness in knowledge and understanding of dynamic properties of FRP footbridges.

Description

In addition, dynamic properties are reviewed with the results of six other FRP footbridges and 124 non-FRP footbridges built after 1991. A comprehensive comparison of these 138 sets of dynamic properties shows that FRP footbridges possess similar fundamental frequencies at the same span, but usually higher damping ratios (mean of 2.5% c.f. mean of <1.0% for steel, concrete and steel-concrete composite).

Additionally, natural frequencies and damping ratios identified from free decays measured on FRP footbridges are response amplitude dependent. Comparing the accelerance peaks of FRP and conventional footbridges revealed that the FRP footbridges are, on average, around 3.5 times more responsive to resonant excitation than the conventional bridges having the same bridge length, deck width and mode shape due to their significantly lower modal mass.<br><br>The zip file contains a number of subfolders, each with a readme file.

Read the rest (1 more)

The folders relate to: 1 Parsons Bridge 2 Dover Bridge 3 St Austell Bridge 4 Delft A 5 Delft B 6 Prato Bridge 7 Wilcott Bridge 8 Halgavor Bridge

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Structural dynamics 78%
Provenance · 1 source records, 17 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
figshareoai:figshare.com:article/3377960811 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:400509enrichment · figshare comtaxonomy-embedding@1.0.0title+keywords+description (78%)
concepts[field].local:field:astronomymapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:chemistrymapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:computer-science-aimapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:economics-financemapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:engineeringmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:life-sciencesmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:medicine-healthmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:ocean-atmosphericmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
descriptionsource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
licensesource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0/metadata/dc/rights
publication_datesource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
titlesource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title