Characterization of the X-Shyne library

These results were then compared with the results from a synthetic analysis based on three self-consistent atmospheric models: the cloudy models Exo-REM and Sonora Diamondback, and the cloudless model ATMO. To compare our spectra with these grids we used the Bayesian inference code ForMoSA. We found similar Lbol estimates between both approaches, but an underestimated Teff from the cloudy models, likely due to a lack of absorbers that could dominate the J and H bands of early L. We also observed a discrepancy in the log(g) estimates, which are dispersed between 3.5 and 5.5dex for mid-L objects.

We interpreted this as a bias caused by a range of rotational velocities leading to cloud migration toward equatorial latitudes, combined with a variety of viewing angles that result in different observed atmospheric properties (cloud column densities, atmospheric pressures, etc.). This interpretation is supported by the correlation of the color anomaly D(J-K) of each object with log(g) and the parameter fsed that drives the sedimentation of the clouds.

Finally, while providing robust estimates of [M/H] and C/O for individual objects remains challenging, the X-SHYNE library globally suggests solar values, which are consistent with a formation via stellar formation mechanisms. This study highlights the strength of homogeneous datasets in performing comparative analyses, reducing the impact of systematics, and ensuring robust conclusions while avoiding over-interpretation.