← Search

Data · dataset · 2011

Do Self-Identified Tactical Voters Actually Vote Tactically? Evidence from the 2010 British Election

Listed in Harvard Dataverse

The typical conception of tactical voting in the political science literature suggests that tactical voters vote for a party other than the one they prefer most.

Description

Previous research in the British Journal of Political Science on the measurement of tactical voting in Britain has assumed that voters who say they have voted tactically have actually behaved as the political science conception suggests. This Article tests that assumption.

I find that one-half of voters who self-identify tactical motivations do not fit the political science definition of tactical voting. The result indicates that scholars have dramatically overestimated the level of tactical voting (at least as political scientists define it) in Britain and, more importantly, that the methodological foundations of existing tactical voting research are invalid.

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1
Provenance · 1 source records, 6 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
Harvard Dataversedoi:10.7910/DVN/DSIZMA14 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
created_datesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0
descriptionsource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0/description
publication_datesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0
titlesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0/name
updated_datesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0
version_labelsource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0