Supplementary file 1_Development and external validation of an explainable XGBoost model with a web-based calculator for risk prediction of postpartum depressive symptoms.docx

Model discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with calibration and decision curve analyses performed additionally. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used for model interpretation.</p>Results<p>Screening-positive rates were 38.0% in the development cohort and 26.0% in the external validation cohort. Tree-based ensemble models showed broadly comparable performance. eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) was selected based on its numerically highest mean cross-validated AUC and balanced overall performance, with AUCs of 0.895 ± 0.033 in cross-validation, 0.845 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.751–0.940) in the internal test set, and 0.820 (95% CI: 0.743–0.889) in the external validation cohort.

Calibration was acceptable in the internal test set, whereas absolute risk was overestimated in the external validation cohort. Decision curve analysis indicated potential net clinical benefit. SHAP identified age, marital relationship quality, prenatal depressive symptoms, monthly personal income, and sleep disturbance as important model-based contributors.

A four-predictor web calculator was developed.</p>Discussion<p>The explainable XGBoost model showed promising discrimination for predicting EPDS-defined postpartum depressive symptoms. However, given the modest external validation sample and evidence of risk overestimation, further prospective multicenter validation and recalibration are needed before routine clinical implementation.</p>