Data · dataset · 2026
Alcohol attention bias: an examination of social drinking populations and methods of measurement
Listed in ZivaHub and Deakin Research Online and DMU Figshare — shown once because both records carry DOI 10.17034/32634582.v1
Context: Attention bias to alcohol related cues has been implicated in the development and maintenance in problematic drinking behaviour.
Description
Research has demonstrated ‘alcohol attention bias’ (AAB) in subclinical drinking populations as well as problem drinkers, however this is not as firmly established in subclinical drinking populations and a variety of direct and indirect measures of attention are used to detect this phenomena.<br><br>Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate and quantify AAB detection in subclinical drinking populations, investigating whether AAB was present in subclinical drinking populations when attention to alcohol versus neutral stimuli was measured.
The review focused on two methodologies (visual probe and eye tracking) commonly used to detect AAB.<br><br>Data sources: A systematic review of English language, peer reviewed articles were identified using PsycINFO, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases (up to and including 1st April 2019). An additional study was identified by searching relevant bibliographies.<br><br>Study Selection: Only studies that used visual probe and/or eye tracking methodology to assess cognitive bias between alcohol and neutral stimuli in subclinical drinkers were included.
Read the rest (2 more)
A total of five eye-tracking studies and thirteen visual probe studies met full eligibility criteria.<br><br>Data Extraction: Independent extraction of articles by 2 researchers using predefined eligibility criteria. Subclinical drinking group mean reaction times and fixation times were pooled for alcohol and neutral stimuli.<br><br>Data Synthesis: Random-effects models were used to assess eye tracking (g = -0.41; 95% Cl (-0.96, 0.15); Z= 1.43;p = .15) and visual probe studies (g = -0.09, 95% Cl (-0.19, 0.01); Z = 0.1 \;p - .92) and revealed no significant attention bias effect in the subclinical drinking populations studied; Considerable heterogeneity was present in eye tracking studies.<br><br>Conclusions: No attention bias was present in subclinical drinkers when eye tracking and visual probe methodology is used.
Methodological standardisation and measurement issues for future research are discussed.
Links
Where it is published
- DOI doi.org/10.17034/32634582.v1 ↗
DOI / persistent id · from zivahub uct ac za
Catalogue records · 1
- OAI-PMH record api.figshare.com/v2/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_dc&identifier=oai%3Af… ↗
metadata API · from zivahub uct ac za
Topics
Provenance · 3 source records, 7 field assertions
| Source | Key | Last seen | Raw |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZivaHub | oai:figshare.com:article/32634582 | 12 d ago | JSON v1 |
| Deakin Research Online | oai:figshare.com:article/32634582 | 12 d ago | JSON v1 |
| DMU Figshare | oai:figshare.com:article/32634582 | 12 d ago | JSON v1 |
| Field | Assertion | Extractor | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmental | mapping · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmental | mapping · figshare dmu ac uk | connector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmental | mapping · dro deakin edu au | connector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0 | |
| description | source · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | /metadata/dc/description |
| license_text | source · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | |
| publication_date | source · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | |
| title | source · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | /metadata/dc/title |