← Search

Data · collection · 2018

Labelling faces as ‘Autistic’ reduces the inversion effect

Listed in DataCite

Does the belief that a face belongs to an individual with autism affect recognition of that face?

Description

To address this question, we used the inversion effect as a marker of face recognition. In Experiment 1, participants completed a recognition task involving upright and inverted faces labelled as either ‘regular’ or ‘autistic’.

In reality, the faces presented in both conditions were identical. Results revealed a smaller inversion effect for faces labelled as autistic. Thus, simply labelling a face as ‘autistic’ disrupts recognition.

Read the rest (1 more)

Experiment 2 showed a larger inversion effect after the provision of humanizing versus dehumanizing information about faces labelled as ‘autistic’. We suggest changes in the inversion effect could be used as a measure to study stigma within the context of objectification and dehumanization.

Links

Topics

Related

Provenance · 1 source records, 11 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
DataCite10.25384/sage.c.4301894.v114 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · DataCiteconnector:datacite@1.0.0/data/attributes/rightsList
concepts[field].fos:clinical-medicinesource · DataCiteconnector:datacite@1.0.0
concepts[field].fos:educational-sciencessource · DataCiteconnector:datacite@1.0.0
concepts[field].fos:health-sciencessource · DataCiteconnector:datacite@1.0.0
concepts[field].fos:psychologysource · DataCiteconnector:datacite@1.0.0
created_datesource · DataCiteconnector:datacite@1.0.0
descriptionsource · DataCiteconnector:datacite@1.0.0/data/attributes/descriptions
licensesource · DataCiteconnector:datacite@1.0.0/data/attributes/rightsList
publication_datesource · DataCiteconnector:datacite@1.0.0/data/attributes/dates
titlesource · DataCiteconnector:datacite@1.0.0/data/attributes/titles/0/title
updated_datesource · DataCiteconnector:datacite@1.0.0