Related Data for: Shoulder biomechanics of para-table tennis – A case study of a standing class para-athlete with severe leg impairment

Methods

One international level Class 7 male para-table tennis player was compared with a control group of 9 male, competitive university team players. Participants performed 15 trials of forehand and 15 trials of backhand topspin drives. Shoulder abduction/adduction angles and joint range of motion (ROM) were measured using an inertial measurement system.

Results: The joint ROM of the para-player was comparable to the control group in the forehand [para-player 38, controls 32 (15)] and slightly larger in backhand [para-player 35, controls 24 (16)]. Waveform analysis revealed significant differences in the entire forehand drives (p < .001) and the preparation (p < .001) and follow-through phases (p = .014) of the backhand drives. Conclusions: Coaches should not simply instruct para-table tennis players to replicate the characteristics of able-bodied players.

Depending on the nature of the physical impairment, para-players should optimise their movement strategies for successful performance.