The Integrated Service Model and the Assessment Instruments of Marital Violence and Child Abuse

This study used multiple data collection methods, including questionnaire and focus group. Five focus groups were held around the nation with 24 professionals participated. Quantitative data was collected from a sample of 38 professionals in public or private agencies.

Results show that there is no consistent model across the nation and lack of standardized procedures for serving dual-violence families. Each model has its own advantages and disadvantages. Research results suggest that a complete service package should include individual services for the husband, the wife, and their children, and treatment for the whole family as well.

Moreover, it is better to have a social worker who is mainly in charge of the family with authorized power. Finally, it is suggested that the treatment focus should be family, and services should be extended to all family members. The service goal is to increase the well-being of the whole family, rather than what makes easy for social workers.