Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2026

Rules, discretion and industrialisation: the patent system of the Netherlands, 1817-1869

Listed in ZivaHub and Deakin Research Online and DMU Figshare and UCL Research Data Repository — shown once because both records carry DOI 10.17034/32632773.v1

This thesis investigates the patent system introduced in 1817 by the United Kingdom of the Netherlands, and its fate in its successor states of Belgium and the Netherlands from 1830.

Description

This patent system differed strongly from present-day patent systems because it gave patent authorities a high degree of discretion on whether and under what conditions to grant a patent. As such, this context can provide lessons for patent reform today.

But besides the potential for historical analogues, this context is also important historically: while an industrialising Belgium reformed its patent system in 1854, the Netherlands, the late industrialiser, abolished theirs in 1869. <br><br>To investigate these questions, the thesis methodologically steps away from a purely formal understanding of patent laws. It integrates the administrative implementation of formal rules, and so uncovers the creative force administrative discretion can be.

Read the rest (2 more)

It combines in-depth archival research with a newly constructed patent database. The new database integrates the methodological perspective by including the non-granted patents and the administrative process that led to patent grants or their refusal. This is a rare if not unique feature in quantitative historical patent research. <br><br>With this methodology, I find that the highly discretionary patent system developed fairly consistent practices, treating applicants professionally and equitably, whether foreigners or domestic residents.

In Belgium, this practice was continued after independence in 1830 and made more transparent and accessible, until the law was undermined by its own success. By contrast, in the Netherlands the patent system withered away in the face of a lack of interest and a hostile environment from politicians, judges and industrialists. I argue that there is a mutually reinforcing dynamic between the Industrial Revolution and the patent system, and that the Dutch abolition of its patent system should therefore be seen as an evolutionary rather than a revolutionary event.<br>

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Provenance · 4 source records, 28 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
ZivaHuboai:figshare.com:article/326327735 d agoJSON v1
Deakin Research Onlineoai:figshare.com:article/326327735 d agoJSON v1
DMU Figshareoai:figshare.com:article/326327735 d agoJSON v1
UCL Research Data Repositoryoai:figshare.com:article/326327735 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:380103mapping · dro deakin edu auvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['economic history']
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:380103mapping · figshare dmu ac ukvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['economic history']
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:380103mapping · rdr ucl ac ukvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['economic history']
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:380103mapping · zivahub uct ac zavocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['economic history']
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · rdr ucl ac ukconnector:rdr_ucl_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:economics-financemapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:economics-financemapping · rdr ucl ac ukconnector:rdr_ucl_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:economics-financemapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:economics-financemapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:engineeringmapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:engineeringmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:engineeringmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:engineeringmapping · rdr ucl ac ukconnector:rdr_ucl_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · rdr ucl ac ukconnector:rdr_ucl_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · rdr ucl ac ukconnector:rdr_ucl_ac_uk@1.0.0
descriptionsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
license_textsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
publication_datesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
titlesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title