Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2026

Inclusive Sensory Reconfiguration:Exploring How Olfactory Cues Influence Civic Engagement Among Visually Impaired Persons

Listed in ScienceDB

This study investigated whether olfactory cues can function as informational signals that influence judgment and cognitive processing among visually impaired persons (VIPs) during an everyday civic task.

Description

The study hypothesized that the presence and semantic consistency of olfactory cues would affect judgment accuracy, response time, cognitive load, and subjective experience. It was also expected that the effects of olfactory cues would depend on their relationship with the task category rather than on odor type alone.The dataset was collected through a controlled experiment using waste sorting as a representative rule-based civic task.

Participants classified waste items into recyclable, non-recyclable, and hazardous categories under three conditions: a no-odor baseline condition, an odor–category congruent condition, and an odor–category incongruent condition. Each participant completed 108 trials across three experimental rounds. The dataset includes behavioral measures, including classification accuracy and response time; questionnaire data, including NASA-TLX cognitive load ratings and Self-Assessment Manikin ratings; electroencephalography data used to examine cognitive load-related neural activity; and qualitative data from post-task interviews.The data indicate that olfactory cues can enter the judgment process as implicit informational resources rather than functioning only as emotional or atmospheric stimuli.

Read the rest (2 more)

However, their effects are not uniformly beneficial or detrimental. Judgment performance and cognitive load vary according to the interaction between the olfactory cue and the waste category or task condition. In particular, the findings suggest that cognitive load is not determined by odor type or task condition independently, but by how sensory information is configured in relation to task demands.The dataset should therefore be interpreted by comparing conditions and examining interaction effects rather than treating individual odor conditions as isolated variables.

Behavioral, questionnaire, EEG, and interview data may be analyzed separately or triangulated to examine relationships among task performance, cognitive processing, and subjective experience. The data may support research on multisensory interaction, inclusive information systems, accessible civic participation, olfactory interface design, and sensory reconfiguration in visually constrained tasks. Because the study was conducted within a controlled waste-sorting task, interpretations should remain sensitive to the experimental context and should not be generalized directly to all public environments or olfactory applications.

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Provenance · 1 source records, 10 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
ScienceDB10.57760/sciencedb.4303311 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:engineeringmapping · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:life-sciencesmapping · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
descriptionsource · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
license_textsource · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
publication_datesource · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
titlesource · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title