Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2025

Validation of the Effectiveness of the Range-Fixed Trade-off Method (RFTM)

Listed in ScienceDB

This study aims to test the effectiveness of the Range-Fixed Trade-off Method (RFTM) by comparing the utility functions elicited by it and by the conventional trade-off method.

Description

To this end, a within-subjects design was adopted with two sub-experiments: Sub-experiment A used the Range-Fixed Trade-off Method, and Sub-experiment B used the conventional trade-off method. All subjects completed both sub-experiments and produced a standard outcome sequence and a standard probability sequence.In Sub-experiment A, subjects were first asked to choose between the initial prospect R=(6000CNY,0.1;200CNY,0.5;0CNY,0.4) and the prospect S^'=(5000CNY,0.1;x,0.5;0CNY,0.4) constructed using the bisection method based on the initial prospect, where x=(0+m)\/2.

If R was chosen, implying x_1∈(x,5000), update x=(x+5000)\/2 and repeat the operation; else, x=(0+x)\/2 and repeat the operation. After 5 iterations, the program then recorded the midpoint of the final interval where x_1 lies as x_1. Update R by replacing x_0 (i.e. 200CNY) with x_1, and continue similarly to elicit x_2 through x_6.

Read the rest (3 more)

Next, elicit q_i (i=1,⋯,5) for indifference between R=(x_6,q_i;x_(0,) 1-q_i ) and S=(x_i,1), using 6 bisection iterations per q_i.In Sub-experiment B, subjects were first asked to choose between the initial prospect S=(200CNY,2/3;100CNY,1/3) and the prospect R^'=(x,,2/3;0CNY,1/3) constructed using the bisection method based on the initial prospect, where x=(200+5000)\/2. If the subject chose prospect S, implying x_1∈(x,200+5000), update x=(x+200+5000)\/2 and repeat the operation; else, x=(200+x)\/2 and repeat the operation.

After 5 iterations, the program then recorded the midpoint of the final interval where x_1 lies as x_1. Update S by replacing x_0 (i.e. 200CNY) with x_1, and proceed to elicit x_2 through x_6. Then, elicit q_i (i=1,⋯,5) for indifference between R=(x_6,q_i;x_(0,) 1-q_i ) and S=(x_i,1), with 6 bisection iterations each.As such, eliciting each x_i (i=1,⋯,6) required 5 choices per subject, while each q_i (i=1,⋯,5) required 6 choices.

To assess data reliability, after eliciting both standard outcome sequence and standard probability sequence, subjects re-answered the fourth question for each element in both sequences. 

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Econometrics 71%
Provenance · 1 source records, 11 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
ScienceDB10.57760/sciencedb.294119 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[field].anzsrc:group:3802enrichment · scidb cntaxonomy-embedding@1.0.0title+keywords+description (71%)
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:economics-financemapping · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:engineeringmapping · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:life-sciencesmapping · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
descriptionsource · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
license_textsource · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
publication_datesource · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
titlesource · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title