Data · dataset · 2025
Validation of the Effectiveness of the Range-Fixed Trade-off Method (RFTM)
Listed in ScienceDB
This study aims to test the effectiveness of the Range-Fixed Trade-off Method (RFTM) by comparing the utility functions elicited by it and by the conventional trade-off method.
Description
To this end, a within-subjects design was adopted with two sub-experiments: Sub-experiment A used the Range-Fixed Trade-off Method, and Sub-experiment B used the conventional trade-off method. All subjects completed both sub-experiments and produced a standard outcome sequence and a standard probability sequence.In Sub-experiment A, subjects were first asked to choose between the initial prospect R=(6000CNY,0.1;200CNY,0.5;0CNY,0.4) and the prospect S^'=(5000CNY,0.1;x,0.5;0CNY,0.4) constructed using the bisection method based on the initial prospect, where x=(0+m)\/2.
If R was chosen, implying x_1∈(x,5000), update x=(x+5000)\/2 and repeat the operation; else, x=(0+x)\/2 and repeat the operation. After 5 iterations, the program then recorded the midpoint of the final interval where x_1 lies as x_1. Update R by replacing x_0 (i.e. 200CNY) with x_1, and continue similarly to elicit x_2 through x_6.
Read the rest (3 more)
Next, elicit q_i (i=1,⋯,5) for indifference between R=(x_6,q_i;x_(0,) 1-q_i ) and S=(x_i,1), using 6 bisection iterations per q_i.In Sub-experiment B, subjects were first asked to choose between the initial prospect S=(200CNY,2/3;100CNY,1/3) and the prospect R^'=(x,,2/3;0CNY,1/3) constructed using the bisection method based on the initial prospect, where x=(200+5000)\/2. If the subject chose prospect S, implying x_1∈(x,200+5000), update x=(x+200+5000)\/2 and repeat the operation; else, x=(200+x)\/2 and repeat the operation.
After 5 iterations, the program then recorded the midpoint of the final interval where x_1 lies as x_1. Update S by replacing x_0 (i.e. 200CNY) with x_1, and proceed to elicit x_2 through x_6. Then, elicit q_i (i=1,⋯,5) for indifference between R=(x_6,q_i;x_(0,) 1-q_i ) and S=(x_i,1), with 6 bisection iterations each.As such, eliciting each x_i (i=1,⋯,6) required 5 choices per subject, while each q_i (i=1,⋯,5) required 6 choices.
To assess data reliability, after eliciting both standard outcome sequence and standard probability sequence, subjects re-answered the fourth question for each element in both sequences.
Links
Where it is published
- DOI doi.org/10.57760/sciencedb.29411 ↗
DOI / persistent id · from scidb cn
Catalogue records · 1
- OAI-PMH record scidb.cn/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_dc&identifier=10.57760%2… ↗
metadata API · from scidb cn
Topics
- From keywords
- Earth & Environmental Science · Economics & Finance · Engineering · Humanities · Life Sciences · Social Science
- Inferred from text
- Econometrics 71%
Provenance · 1 source records, 11 field assertions
| Source | Key | Last seen | Raw |
|---|---|---|---|
| ScienceDB | 10.57760/sciencedb.29411 | 9 d ago | JSON v1 |
| Field | Assertion | Extractor | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| concepts[field].anzsrc:group:3802 | enrichment · scidb cn | taxonomy-embedding@1.0.0 | title+keywords+description (71%) |
| concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmental | mapping · scidb cn | connector:scidb_cn@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:economics-finance | mapping · scidb cn | connector:scidb_cn@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:engineering | mapping · scidb cn | connector:scidb_cn@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:humanities | mapping · scidb cn | connector:scidb_cn@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:life-sciences | mapping · scidb cn | connector:scidb_cn@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:social-science | mapping · scidb cn | connector:scidb_cn@1.0.0 | |
| description | source · scidb cn | connector:scidb_cn@1.0.0 | /metadata/dc/description |
| license_text | source · scidb cn | connector:scidb_cn@1.0.0 | |
| publication_date | source · scidb cn | connector:scidb_cn@1.0.0 | |
| title | source · scidb cn | connector:scidb_cn@1.0.0 | /metadata/dc/title |