← Search

Data · dataset · 2014

A dynamic Ellsberg urn experiment [Dataset]

Listed in heiDATA

Description

Abstract

Many theories of updating under ambiguity assume either dynamic consistency or consequentialism to underpin behaviorally the link between conditional and unconditional preferences. To test the descriptive validity of these rationality concepts, we conduct a dynamic extension of Ellsbergʼs 3-color experiment. We find that more subjects act in line with consequentialism than with dynamic consistency and that this result is even stronger among ambiguity av erse subjects.

Read the rest (2 more)

Highlights We experimentally test consequentialism versus dynamic consistency. The design is a dynamic extension of the 3-color Ellsberg urn. More subjects violate dynamic consistency than consequentialism.

Violating subjects (for both axioms) are less confident in their responses.

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Stated by source
Social Sciences
From keywords
Social Science
Provenance · 1 source records, 8 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
heiDATAdoi:10.11588/DATA/1000515 h agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[field].dataverse_subject:social-sciencessource · heidata uni heidelberg deconnector:heidata_uni_heidelberg_de@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · heidata uni heidelberg deconnector:heidata_uni_heidelberg_de@1.0.0/subjects
created_datesource · heidata uni heidelberg deconnector:heidata_uni_heidelberg_de@1.0.0
descriptionsource · heidata uni heidelberg deconnector:heidata_uni_heidelberg_de@1.0.0/description
publication_datesource · heidata uni heidelberg deconnector:heidata_uni_heidelberg_de@1.0.0
titlesource · heidata uni heidelberg deconnector:heidata_uni_heidelberg_de@1.0.0/name
updated_datesource · heidata uni heidelberg deconnector:heidata_uni_heidelberg_de@1.0.0
version_labelsource · heidata uni heidelberg deconnector:heidata_uni_heidelberg_de@1.0.0