Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2010

Replication data for: Bias in Conditional and Unconditional Fixed Effects Logit Estimation: A Correction

Listed in Harvard Dataverse

In a recent paper published in this journal, Katz (2001) compares the bias in conditional and unconditional fixed effects logit estimation using Monte Carlo Simulation.

Description

This note shows that while Katz's (2001) specification has "wrong" fixed effects (in the sense that the fixed effects are the same for all individuals), his conclusions still hold if I correct his specification (so that the fixed effects do differ over individuals).

This note also illustrates the danger, when using logit, of including dummies when no fixed effects are present.

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Simulation 75%
Provenance · 1 source records, 7 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
Harvard Dataversedoi:10.7910/DVN/41HIQD13 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[method].local:method:simulationenrichment · Harvard Dataversekeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (75%)
created_datesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0
descriptionsource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0/description
publication_datesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0
titlesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0/name
updated_datesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0
version_labelsource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0