Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2007

Replication data for: Issue Fluidity on the U.S. Supreme Court

Listed in Harvard Dataverse

In making decisions on the merits, the members of the U.S. Supreme Court are often willing to provide authoritative answers to questions that have not been asked and to disregard issues that the parties have presented.

Description

What accounts for these forms of issue fluidity? Analyzing data from the 1988 term of the Court, we find that issue transformation is quite common, occurring in roughly half of the cases on the plenary agenda.

We propose models of both issue discovery and issue suppression that, while successful in explaining how the justices select issues, suggests that these two forms of fluidity result from largely different influences.

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Stated by source
Social Sciences
Provenance · 1 source records, 7 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
Harvard Dataversedoi:10.7910/DVN/QJGWDY13 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[field].dataverse_subject:social-sciencessource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0/subjects
created_datesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0
descriptionsource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0/description
publication_datesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0
titlesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0/name
updated_datesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0
version_labelsource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0