SDSS DR9 galaxy clusters optical catalog

We cross-correlate the main AMF DR9 catalog with a number of cluster catalogs in different wavebands (Optical, X-ray). We compare our catalog with other SDSS-based ones such as the redMaPPer (Rykoff et al., 2014, Cat. J/ApJ/785/104, 26350 clusters) and the Wen et al. (WHL, 2012, Cat.

J/ApJS/199/34) (132684 clusters) in the same area of the sky and in the overlapping redshift range. We match 97% of the richest Abell clusters (Richness group 3), the same as WHL, while redMaPPer matches ~90% of these clusters. Considering AMF DR9 richness bins, redMaPPer does not have one-to-one matches for 70% of our lowest richness clusters (20<{Lambda}_200_<40), while WHL matches 54% of these missed clusters (not present in redMaPPer). redMaPPer consistently does not possess one-to-one matches for ~20% AMF DR9 clusters with {Lambda}_200_>40, while WHL matches >=70% of these missed clusters on average.

For comparisons with X-ray clusters, we match the AMF catalog with BAX, MCXC and a combined catalog from NORAS and REFLEX. We consistently obtain a greater number of one-to-one matches for X--ray clusters across higher luminosity bins (L_x_>6x10^44^erg/s) than redMaPPer while WHL matches the most clusters overall. For the most luminous clusters (L_x_>8), our catalog performs equivalently to WHL.

This new catalog provides a wider sample than redMaPPer while retaining many fewer objects than WHL.