Decadal fates and impacts of nitrogen additions on temperate forest carbon storage: a data–model comparison

Simulations using both open and closed N cycles overestimated plant N recovery following N additions. In particular, the model configuration with a closed N cycle simulated that plants acquired more than twice the amount of added N recovered in N-15 tracer studies on short timescales (CLM5: 46 +/- 12 %; observations: 18 +/- 12 %; mean across sites +/- 1 standard deviation) and almost twice as much on longer timescales (CLM5: 23 +/- 6 %; observations: 13 +/- 5 %).

Soil N recoveries in simulations with closed N cycles were closer to observations in the short term (CLM5: 40 +/- 10 %; observations: 54 +/- 22 %) but smaller than observations in the long term (CLM5: 59 +/- 15 %; observations: 69 +/- 18 %). Simulations with open N cycles estimated similar patterns in plant and soil N recovery, except that soil N recovery was also smaller than observations in the short term. In both open and closed sets of simulations, soil N recoveries in CLM5 occurred from the cycling of N through plants rather than through direct immobilization in the soil, as is often indicated by tracer studies.

Although CLM5 greatly overestimated plant N recovery, the simulated increase in C stocks to recovered N was not much larger than estimated by observations, largely because the model's assumed C: N ratio for wood was nearly half that suggested by measurements at the field sites. Overall, results suggest that simulating accurate ecosystem responses to changes in N additions requires increasing soil competition for N relative to plants and examining model assumptions of C : N stoichiometry, which should also improve model estimates of other terrestrial C-N processes and interactions.