Data · dataset · 2025
Alocasia macrorrhizos
Listed in Teesside University Research Data Repository
(Alocasia macrorrhizos) This dataset contains 1,000 samples of made from Alocasia macrorrhizos, classified into two categories: Good (500 samples) and Bad (500 samples).
Description
The classification is based on various sensory, chemical, and microbial properties that influence the quality of the dish. Dataset Structure Each sample is labeled as either Good or Bad, and the dataset includes multiple features that represent the characteristics affecting classification. 1.
Sensory Attributes Color Intensity (CI): Measured on a scale (e.g., RGB values, Lab* scale) Texture (TX): Softness, hardness, and granularity assessed through image processing or tactile sensors Aroma (AR): Measured using an electronic nose or human sensory evaluation (e.g., aromatic intensity, pungency) Taste Profile (TP): Quantified as bitterness, sweetness, or spiciness (e.g., on a scale of 1-10) 2. Chemical Composition pH Value (pH): Indicates acidity or alkalinity (e.g., 5.5–7.5 range) Moisture Content (MC%): Percentage of water content in the sample Protein Content (PC%): Amount of protein in grams per 100g of sample Fat Content (FC%): Percentage of fats present Carbohydrate Content (CC%): Percentage of total carbohydrates Phenolic Content (PC mg/kg): Antioxidant levels measured in milligrams per kilogram Toxic Oxalate Levels (OL mg/kg): Presence of calcium oxalate, which can affect edibility 3.
Read the rest (1 more)
Microbial and Spoilage Indicators Total Plate Count (TPC CFU/g): Number of bacterial colonies per gram Yeast and Mold Count (YMC CFU/g): Presence of fungi indicating spoilage Pathogen Presence (PP): Binary variable (Yes/No) indicating harmful bacteria like E. coli or Salmonella 4. Preparation and Cooking Variables Cooking Time (CT min): Duration of cooking in minutes Cooking Temperature (CTemp °C): Temperature in degrees Celsius Ingredient Ratio (IR): Proportion of spices, water, and oil used Classification Labels Good (1): Samples meeting acceptable sensory, chemical, and microbial standards Bad (0): Samples failing in sensory, chemical, or microbial quality
Links
Where it is published
- DOI doi.org/10.17632/cdw4rn8xz2.2 ↗
DOI / persistent id · from researchdata tees ac uk
Catalogue records · 1
- OAI-PMH record data.mendeley.com/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_dc&identifier=oai%3Adata… ↗
metadata API · from researchdata tees ac uk
Topics
- From keywords
- Earth & Environmental Science · Life Sciences
- Inferred from text
- Computed tomography 50% · Image 75%
Provenance · 1 source records, 9 field assertions
| Source | Key | Last seen | Raw |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teesside University Research Data Repository | oai:data.mendeley.com/cdw4rn8xz2.2 | 21 h ago | JSON v1 |
| Field | Assertion | Extractor | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| access_level | source · researchdata tees ac uk | connector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmental | mapping · researchdata tees ac uk | connector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:life-sciences | mapping · researchdata tees ac uk | connector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[modality].local:modality:ct | enrichment · researchdata tees ac uk | keyword-concept-rules@1.0.0 | title+description (50%) |
| concepts[modality].local:modality:image | enrichment · researchdata tees ac uk | keyword-concept-rules@1.0.0 | title+description (75%) |
| description | source · researchdata tees ac uk | connector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0 | /metadata/dc/description |
| license | source · researchdata tees ac uk | connector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0 | /metadata/dc/rights |
| publication_date | source · researchdata tees ac uk | connector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0 | |
| title | source · researchdata tees ac uk | connector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0 | /metadata/dc/title |