Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2010

Replication data for: Simulating Models of Issue Voting

Listed in Harvard Dataverse

How should one analyze data when the underlying models being tested are statistically intractable?

Description

In this article, we offer a simulation approach that involves creating sets of artificial data with fully known generating models that can be meaningfully compared to real data. The strategy depends on constructing simulations that are well matched to the data against which they will be compared.

Our particular concern is to consider concurrently how voters place parties on issue scales and how they evaluate parties based on issues. We reconsider the Lewis and King (2000) analysis of issue voting in Norway. The simulation findings resolve the ambiguity that Lewis and King report, as voters appear to assimilate and contrast party placements and to evaluate parties directionally.

Read the rest (1 more)

The simulations also provide a strong caveat against the use of individually perceived party placements in analyses of issue voting.

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Simulation 75%
Provenance · 1 source records, 7 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
Harvard Dataversedoi:10.7910/DVN/09YAWL12 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[method].local:method:simulationenrichment · Harvard Dataversekeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (75%)
created_datesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0
descriptionsource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0/description
publication_datesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0
titlesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0/name
updated_datesource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0
version_labelsource · Harvard Dataverseconnector:dataverse@1.0.0