Data · dataset · 2026
Global patterns and drivers of the Anthropocene defaunation crisis
Listed in ZivaHub and Deakin Research Online and DMU Figshare — shown once because both records carry DOI 10.17034/32639913.v1
Global biodiversity is declining at accelerating rates, with growing evidence to suggest that we may be on the brink of the planet’s ‘sixth mass extinction’.
Description
Traditionally, the magnitude of this crisis has been estimated using conservation categories from the IUCN Red List. However, these categories provide a static snapshot of species' current extinction risk, neglecting progressive demographic erosions towards extinction.
Recently, population trends have emerged as an additional proxy for extinction risk, given that this metric is based on changes in population sizes through time, thus having the potential to indicate a species’ future extinction risk. Despite this advantage, population trends remain largely under-utilised across conservation research. My PhD addresses this gap by examining the current biodiversity crisis using population trends as an additional proxy for extinction risk.
Read the rest (4 more)
My research revealed that 48% of animal species are declining in population sizes, 49% are stable, and only 3% are increasing, Additionally, 33% of species categorised as non-threatened are declining. Integrating conservation categories with population trends revealed that 23% of vertebrates globally are at the highest risk of extinction (threatened declining), primarily in the tropics. Life history traits played a role in the declines of non-threatened vertebrates, while anthropogenic threats influenced taxon-dependent stages.
Moreover, only 2% of threatened vertebrates are experiencing population stability or increase. We revealed that the number of species on the verge of becoming categorised as threatened (1,830 Near Threatened declining species) is 31-fold higher than the number of species on the verge of becoming non-threatened (59 Vulnerable increasing species). Based on this latent extinction risk, we revealed that extinction risk hotspots are predicted to expand in geographic magnitude across each vertebrate taxonomic class.
For amphibians in particular, we revealed 41% of species are at the highest extinction risk (threatened declining), predominantly in the Neotropics and Sri Lanka. Life history traits influenced declines in non-threatened species, while environmental factors influenced declines in threatened species. Finally, our assessment of the role of UV-B in amphibian extinctions revealed that increasing UV-B radiation predicted the likelihood of being both threatened and declining for temperate salamanders, while decreasing UV-B predicted declining population sizes for temperate frogs and low elevation tropical frog species.
Overall, this thesis suggests that our understanding of biodiversity loss is underestimated when using conservation categories alone. The integration of extinction risk proxies provides a nuanced identification of species on the brink of extinction, aiding to anticipate potential oncoming crises in certain taxa and factors contributing to this increasing risk, offering a pre-emptive approach for conservation.
Links
Where it is published
- DOI doi.org/10.17034/32639913.v1 ↗
DOI / persistent id · from zivahub uct ac za
Catalogue records · 1
- OAI-PMH record api.figshare.com/v2/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_dc&identifier=oai%3Af… ↗
metadata API · from zivahub uct ac za
Topics
- From keywords
- Earth & Environmental Science · Earth & Environmental Science · Earth & Environmental Science · Life Sciences · Life Sciences · Life Sciences · Social Science · Social Science · Social Science
- Inferred from text
- Environmental management 74%
Provenance · 3 source records, 14 field assertions
| Source | Key | Last seen | Raw |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZivaHub | oai:figshare.com:article/32639913 | 5 d ago | JSON v1 |
| Deakin Research Online | oai:figshare.com:article/32639913 | 5 d ago | JSON v1 |
| DMU Figshare | oai:figshare.com:article/32639913 | 5 d ago | JSON v1 |
| Field | Assertion | Extractor | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| concepts[field].anzsrc:group:4104 | enrichment · zivahub uct ac za | taxonomy-embedding@1.1.0 | title+keywords+description (74%) |
| concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmental | mapping · dro deakin edu au | connector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmental | mapping · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmental | mapping · figshare dmu ac uk | connector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:life-sciences | mapping · figshare dmu ac uk | connector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:life-sciences | mapping · dro deakin edu au | connector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:life-sciences | mapping · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:social-science | mapping · figshare dmu ac uk | connector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:social-science | mapping · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:social-science | mapping · dro deakin edu au | connector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0 | |
| description | source · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | /metadata/dc/description |
| license_text | source · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | |
| publication_date | source · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | |
| title | source · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | /metadata/dc/title |