← Search

Data · dataset · 2025

Study 2: How Do International Medical Students Make Sense of Internal and External Feedback to Improve Their Dutch Communication Skills?

Listed in IISH Dataverse and ODISSEI Portal — shown once because both records carry DOI 10.34894/rbcruv

Description

Summary of the Study: This study explored how international medical students perceive and integrate internal feedback (self-reflection) and external feedback (from peers, teachers, and simulated patients) while learning medical Dutch communication skills through simulated patient consultations (SPCs). • Design:Mixed-methods design (survey + semi-structured interviews). • Participants: 16 third-year international medical students (3 male, 13 female; mean age = 23; all B2 Dutch CEFR level). • Procedure: Six-session Medical Dutch course during which each session included briefing, SPC, and debriefing.

Students received internal and external feedback systematically integrated into the course. • Instruments: o Feedback perception survey (8 items: preference, satisfaction, trustworthiness, progress facilitation). o Semi-structured interviews (30–60 min, conducted online during COVID-19). o Thematic analysis (Atlas.ti, data saturation reached at 16 interviews). Key Findings: 1. Quantitative survey results: o External feedback scored higher than internal feedback in preference, satisfaction, and trustworthiness. o Both internal and external feedback were rated equally effective for facilitating learning progress. 2.

Read the rest (2 more)

Qualitative themes (5): o Proactive engagement with feedback – students actively sought feedback from teachers, peers, and simulated patients, valuing clarity and actionable advice. o Dialogue and discussion – peer/teacher discussions broadened perspectives and deepened learning. o Self-reflection and progress tracking – internal feedback supported personal growth, even though students sometimes felt overly self-critical. o Value from diverse perspectives – combining feedback from different sources (medical accuracy, patient empathy, peer observation) enriched understanding. o Moment-specific and actionable feedback – timely, targeted feedback was easier to apply immediately. 3.

Conclusion: o External feedback was more trusted and satisfying, but internal feedback was critical for self-regulated learning and growth. o Together, they formed a complementary system, fostering comprehensive communication skill development in L2 medical Dutch.

Links

Topics

Stated by source
Social Sciences · Social Sciences
Provenance · 2 source records, 12 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
IISH Dataversedoi:10.34894/RBCRUV12 d agoJSON v1
ODISSEI Portaldoi:10.34894/RBCRUV8 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[field].dataverse_subject:social-sciencessource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].dataverse_subject:social-sciencessource · portal odissei nlconnector:portal_odissei_nl@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:medicine-healthmapping · portal odissei nlconnector:portal_odissei_nl@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:medicine-healthmapping · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · portal odissei nlconnector:portal_odissei_nl@1.0.0/subjects
created_datesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0
descriptionsource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/description
publication_datesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0
titlesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/name
updated_datesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0
version_labelsource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0