Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2026

Comment on "Surface air relative humidities spuriously exceeding 100% in CMIP5 model output and their impact on future rojections" by K. Ruosteenoja et al. (2017)

Listed in National Center for Atmospheric Research

Key Points: Ruosteenoja et al.'s (2017) claim that supersaturation in the surface atmosphere is unrealistic and necessarily spurious and incorrect.

Description

Supersaturations are a reality that an increasing number of atmospheric models can reproduce even in the surface atmosphere. Modelers should not artificially cap relative humidity at 100% when feeding climate model archives.

Links

Get the data

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Climate model simulation 65%
Provenance · 1 source records, 8 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
National Center for Atmospheric Researchd774a9b1-03d4-467b-88c1-7a568d4a14329 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · data ucar educonnector:data_ucar_edu@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:ocean-atmosphericmapping · data ucar educonnector:data_ucar_edu@1.0.0
concepts[method].local:method:climate-modelenrichment · data ucar edukeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (65%)
created_datesource · data ucar educonnector:data_ucar_edu@1.0.0
descriptionsource · data ucar educonnector:data_ucar_edu@1.0.0/notes
publication_datesource · data ucar educonnector:data_ucar_edu@1.0.0
titlesource · data ucar educonnector:data_ucar_edu@1.0.0/title
updated_datesource · data ucar educonnector:data_ucar_edu@1.0.0