Data · dataset · 2026
Intervention development, process evaluation and feasibility study of a home and school positive behaviour management programme in Northern Irish pre-school settings
Listed in ZivaHub and Deakin Research Online and DMU Figshare — shown once because both records carry DOI 10.17034/32634075.v1
<b>Background</b><br>Research denotes that problematic child behaviour can impact negatively upon caregiver well-being.
Description
Decreased well-being increases use of harsh and punitive discipline measures with such measures exacerbating negative child behaviour, and; thus, negative cycles are created. Evidence suggests that interventions can positively impact upon psychological factors and inter-personal relations of caregivers, resulting in the establishment of positive behaviour management practices, and subsequently improving child behaviour.
Despite a broad academic literature-base in this field, gaps exist in relation to intervention development and combined home and school approaches to behaviour management.<br><br><b>Aims</b><br>High 5! is a combined home and school positive behaviour management programme. This research aims to document intervention development and evaluate the readiness of the High 5! programme and study design for future upscale. <br><br><b>Methods</b><br>Intervention development was informed by the findings of a realist literature review.
Read the rest (4 more)
The programme logic model was tested via a process evaluation that employed a sequential study design, using quantitative and qualitative methods, and a qualitative feasibility study. The study incorporated a six-arm RCT design and was conducted with 27 practitioners and 89 parents of children aged three to four years attending Northern Irish pre-school settings. Quantitative outcomes pertaining to caregiver efficacy were measured using A Tool to Measure Parenting Self-Efficacy (TOPSE) and the Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale (TSES), and those relating to levels of stress via the Parenting Stress Index (PSI-4-SF) and Teacher Stress and Coping Items (TSCI).
Quantitative outcomes were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), with total scores and total subscale scores reported for each outcome measure. Qualitative data pertaining to positive parenting practices, parent-child dyads and child behaviour was collected via semi-structured interview and thematically analysed using NVivo computer analysis software.<br><br><b>Findings</b><br>The High 5! Programme and study design was unanimously viewed to be socially valid by all participants, with the intervention specifically perceived by practitioners to be a welcome refresher course on existing good practice.
An adaptive and blended learning approach was considered optimal and should inform further intervention development. Minor amendments are required for future study upscale, including use of alternate modes of communication with participants and adaptations for newcomer parents. Evidence of intervention promise was established in relation to parenting efficacy, levels of stress, positive practices and child behaviour.
No impact was reported pertaining to parent-child dyads. No evidence of intervention promise was gleaned in relation to practitioner psychological factors, or to interpersonal relations. <br><br><b>Implications</b><br>Study findings implicate that an adaptive version of the intervention should be developed and trialled. Future studies should focus on parental engagement, including readiness for change and intention to change, and utilisation of more comprehensive frameworks for the development of behaviour change interventions, incorporating context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) and participant-centred approaches to research.<br>
Links
Where it is published
- DOI doi.org/10.17034/32634075.v1 ↗
DOI / persistent id · from zivahub uct ac za
Catalogue records · 1
- OAI-PMH record api.figshare.com/v2/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_dc&identifier=oai%3Af… ↗
metadata API · from zivahub uct ac za
Topics
Provenance · 3 source records, 11 field assertions
| Source | Key | Last seen | Raw |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZivaHub | oai:figshare.com:article/32634075 | 10 d ago | JSON v1 |
| Deakin Research Online | oai:figshare.com:article/32634075 | 10 d ago | JSON v1 |
| DMU Figshare | oai:figshare.com:article/32634075 | 10 d ago | JSON v1 |
| Field | Assertion | Extractor | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| concepts[field].anzsrc:field:520101 | enrichment · zivahub uct ac za | taxonomy-embedding@1.1.0 | title+keywords+description (76%) |
| concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmental | mapping · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmental | mapping · figshare dmu ac uk | connector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmental | mapping · dro deakin edu au | connector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:psychology-behavioral | mapping · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:psychology-behavioral | mapping · dro deakin edu au | connector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:psychology-behavioral | mapping · figshare dmu ac uk | connector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0 | |
| description | source · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | /metadata/dc/description |
| license_text | source · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | |
| publication_date | source · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | |
| title | source · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | /metadata/dc/title |