Data · dataset · 2017
Coalition Presidentialism in Bicameral Congresses: How does the Control of a Bicameral Majority Affect Coalition Survival?
Listed in DataCite
Presidential legislative majorities under bicameral congresses have seldom been considered in the literature on coalition cabinets.
Description
However, this combination is far from being an isolated or irrelevant topic. Bicameral congresses comprise a double round of negotiation for the executive, increasing the shadow of the unexpected.
Indeed, controlling one of the two chambers may not be sufficient for a president to guarantee the approval of policies. In this case, what if a government does not control both houses? How are coalition cabinets affected by the non-control of one or both chambers?
Read the rest (1 more)
I will focus analysis on the 25 cases of coalition cabinets in Latin America since the return of democracy and present a bicameral framework. Through mvQCA, I find that, contrary to common belief, the controlling of a bicameral majority is neither necessary nor sufficient to ensure stable coalitions.
Links
Where it is published
- Repository landing page scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Coalition_Presidentialism_in_Bicameral_Congre… ↗
landing page · from DataCite
- DOI doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5719225.v1 ↗
DOI / persistent id · from DataCite
Documentation and papers
- Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode ↗
license · from DataCite
- IsSupplementTo 10.1590/1981-3821201700020002 doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201700020002 ↗
publication · from DataCite
Catalogue records · 2
- DataCite API api.datacite.org/dois/10.6084/m9.figshare.5719225.v1 ↗
metadata API · from DataCite
- DataCite Commons commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5719225.v1 ↗
catalogue entry · from DataCite
Topics
- Stated by source
- Political science
Related
Provenance · 1 source records, 9 field assertions
| Source | Key | Last seen | Raw |
|---|---|---|---|
| DataCite | 10.6084/m9.figshare.5719225.v1 | 15 d ago | JSON v1 |
| Field | Assertion | Extractor | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| access_level | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/rightsList |
| byte_size | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].fos:political-science | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | |
| created_date | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | |
| description | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/descriptions |
| license | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/rightsList |
| publication_date | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/dates |
| title | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/titles/0/title |
| updated_date | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 |