← Search

Data · dataset · 2020

Children and adults distinguish irrelevant from relevant actions in over-imitation tasks – but some irrelevant actions are easier to identify than others

Listed in Teesside University Research Data Repository

With this dataset, we investigated the ability of 4-year-old children and adults to discriminate between relevant and different types of irrelevant actions (pseudo-instrumental actions, noncontact actions, see Schleihauf & Hoehl, 2020).

Description

We applied a visual paired preference eye-tracking paradigm in a within-subject design. In each trial, we presented two video clips simultaneously showing actions of different action types.

These actions were either functionally irrelevant or relevant for reaching a prior specified goal, i.e. extracting a golden marble from a puzzle box. Participants saw either (a) two nonidentical actions of the same action type (two irrelevant noncontact actions, two irrelevant pseudo-instrumental actions, or two relevant actions), (b) a relevant action paired with an irrelevant pseudo-instrumental action, (c) a relevant action paired with an irrelevant noncontact irrelevant action, or (d) an irrelevant pseudo-instrumental action paired with an irrelevant noncontact irrelevant action.

Read the rest (2 more)

Participants were instructed that after watching the videos they would be asked to extract a marble themselves. Therefore, we expected participants to direct their attention to the action which seemed most likely to be task-relevant. We measured their looking times to both simultaneously demonstrated actions, which allowed us to calculate a preference score that indicated whether they looked longer at one or the other action (for more details see the word document "Variable description").

We hypothesized that looking preferences are stronger when it is easy for participants to identify the task-relevant action, whereas we thought looking preferences are lower when it is harder for participants to identify the relevant action (for more details see the word document "Hypotheses").

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Video 75%
Provenance · 1 source records, 10 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
Teesside University Research Data Repositoryoai:data.mendeley.com/tp6ppwnwvm.115 h agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].anzsrc:group:5201mapping · researchdata tees ac ukvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['Developmental Psychology']
concepts[field].anzsrc:group:5204mapping · researchdata tees ac ukvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['Cognitive Psychology']
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:psychology-behavioralmapping · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[modality].local:modality:videoenrichment · researchdata tees ac ukkeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (75%)
descriptionsource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
licensesource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/rights
publication_datesource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0
titlesource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title