Constarium
← Search

Table · dataset · 2026

Table 3_Construction of a quality evaluation index system for nutrition nursing clinics based on the Donabedian model.docx

Listed in figshare

Objective<p>To develop an evidence-based quality evaluation index system for Nutrition Nursing Clinics (NNCs) grounded in the Donabedian Structure-Process-Outcome model.</p>Methods<p>A preliminary indicator system was developed through a systematic literature review, expert panel discussions, and a national survey.

Description

Utilizing the Delphi method, 17 experts participated in two rounds of consultation. Questionnaires with a 100% effective response rate in both rounds were used to collect expert opinions on the importance of indicators.

Indicators were screened based on an average importance score ≥3.5 and a coefficient of variation <0.25. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was then applied to calculate the weights for the finalized indicators.</p>Results<p>The expert authority coefficients (Cr) for the two consultation rounds were 0.90 and 0.89, respectively, indicating high expert credibility. The Kendall's W coefficients for all levels of indicators were statistically significant (P < 0.01), demonstrating a good degree of coordination and convergence of expert opinions.

Read the rest (1 more)

Ultimately, a comprehensive quality evaluation index system for NNCs was established, comprising 3 first-level indicators, 16 second-level indicators, and 61 third-level indicators. Consistency Ratio (CR) values for all judgment matrices ranged from 0.0000 to 0.0904, confirming the logical consistency of the assigned weights.</p>Conclusion<p>This study developed a preliminary, consensus-based quality evaluation index system for NNCs, representing a foundational step toward standardized evaluation in this specialty.</p>

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Nutrition and dietetics 74% · Tabular 65%

Related

Provenance · 1 source records, 18 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
figshareoai:figshare.com:article/338714538 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].anzsrc:group:3210enrichment · figshare comtaxonomy-embedding@1.0.0title+keywords+description (74%)
concepts[field].local:field:astronomymapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:chemistrymapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:computer-science-aimapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:economics-financemapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:engineeringmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:life-sciencesmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:medicine-healthmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:ocean-atmosphericmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[modality].local:modality:tabularenrichment · figshare comkeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (65%)
descriptionsource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
licensesource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0/metadata/dc/rights
publication_datesource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
titlesource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title