Spatiotemporal functional permutation tests for comparing observed climate behavior to climate model projections

Comparisons of observed and modeled climate behavior often focus on central tendencies, which overlook other important distributional characteristics related to quantiles and variability. We propose two permutation procedures, standard and stratified, for assessing the accuracy of climate models.

Both procedures eliminate the need to model cross-correlations in the data, encouraging their application in a variety of contexts. By making only slightly stronger assumptions, the stratified procedure dramatically strengthens the ability to detect a difference in the distribution of observed and climate model data. The proposed procedures allow researchers to identify potential model deficiencies over space and time for a variety of distributional characteristics, providing a more comprehensive assessment of climate model accuracy, which will hopefully lead to further model refinements.