Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2017

IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Listed in DataCite

Description

Abstract

A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to estimate the accuracy of IgM ELISA for Leptospirosis diagnosis. A search of Medline, Lilacs, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Grey literature (Google Scholar and British Library) was conducted. The medical subject headings (MeSHs) and the words “leptospirosis”, “human leptospirosis” and “IgM ELISA” were used.

Read the rest (2 more)

Fifty-two studies were analyzed, which included 10,775 samples. The pooled sensitivity of all the studies was 86% (CI 95%, 85%-87%) and specificity was 90% (CI 95%, 89%-91%). In studies of the acute phase, the sensitivity and specificity were 84% (CI 95%, 82%-85%) and 91% (CI 95%, 90%-91%), respectively.

In conclusion, IgM ELISA is sensitive for use as an initial screen for leptospiral infections.

Links

Topics

Stated by source
Political science

Related

Provenance · 1 source records, 9 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
DataCite10.6084/m9.figshare.5720413.v113 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · DataCiteconnector:datacite@1.0.0/data/attributes/rightsList
byte_sizesource · DataCiteconnector:datacite@1.0.0
concepts[field].fos:political-sciencesource · DataCiteconnector:datacite@1.0.0
created_datesource · DataCiteconnector:datacite@1.0.0
descriptionsource · DataCiteconnector:datacite@1.0.0/data/attributes/descriptions
licensesource · DataCiteconnector:datacite@1.0.0/data/attributes/rightsList
publication_datesource · DataCiteconnector:datacite@1.0.0/data/attributes/dates
titlesource · DataCiteconnector:datacite@1.0.0/data/attributes/titles/0/title
updated_datesource · DataCiteconnector:datacite@1.0.0