Structure diagram of the paper

The following is a detailed description: This figure adopts a top-down hierarchical structure, showcasing the six main stages of research, with a focus on the special contradictions of the film industry in Guangdong Province, China. The specific content is as follows: Research starting point: Background and issues At the top of the graph, the core research background is proposed: the structural contradiction of "strong consumption, weak production" faced by Guangdong under the trend of film industrialization development. Theoretical basis: Literature review Based on overseas research, researchers have reviewed existing domestic research and found two main biases: Research on the film industry: biased towards the institutional level, neglecting the human factor. Film editing research: biased towards the artistic level, neglecting the industrial ecology. Thus, the starting point (blank) of the research has been identified: the professional ecology of practitioners. Macro analysis: Industry background Specifically focusing on the film industry in Guangdong, by analyzing its development history and current situation, the core contradiction is extracted: the huge contrast between the "strong film box office province" and the "weak film production province". Micro investigation: empirical research In response to the above contradictions, an empirical investigation will be conducted on the current situation of practitioners, covering four aspects: group composition, characteristics, occupational status, and talent cultivation. Through investigation, two major challenges faced by practitioners have been identified: "downward transformation" and "talent outflow". Theoretical Deepening: Analysis of Causes Apply grounded theory to conduct in-depth analysis of dilemmas. Extract the core category of "the contradiction between career ideals and survival reality" as the fundamental reason for explaining the dilemma. Research endpoint: Suggestions for countermeasures Based on the above analysis, solutions are proposed from four levels: policy support, project education, industry mechanism innovation, and practitioner capacity building. The overall logical line can be summarized as follows: starting from macro contradictions ->finding research gaps through theory ->conducting empirical investigations in the industry ->discovering specific difficulties ->digging deeper into the causes through theoretical tools ->ultimately returning to practical countermeasures.